Search by:
Program Area: All
AllEmergency Response and RecoveryAgricultureHealthEducationMicrofinanceWater and SanitationJustice and PeacebuildingPartnership and Capacity Strengthening
Type: All
AllTools for Field Staff - Best Practices - Guidelines - Learning Briefs - Manuals - Tool KitsResearch - Case Studies - Evaluations/Assessments - Impact Evaluations - Papers/Reports
Region: All
AllAfricaAsiaCentral America, South America & the CaribbeanEuropeMiddle East & North AfricaUnited States

Papers/Reports | June 6, 2012

Agent Productivity in Fee-for-Service Savings Groups

This paper shares findings from a large-scale Randomized Control Trial conducted in Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda. It compares the productivity of Private Service Providers and the productivity of project-paid field agents. This is the second research brief in the SILC Innovations series.

CONTENTS

  • Project background--SILC and the PSP model

  • Research design and productivity

  • Cumulative comparisons on productivity

  • Productivity and variance

  • Trend analysis on productivity

  • Understanding the trend, part 1: Part-time agents and the low-outlier factor

  • Understanding the trend, part 2: Private service providers and the efficiency issues

  • Understanding the trend, part 3: Having to pay vs. getting things for free

  • Conclusion: Kenya is "best performer"